"The 2015 return is important as the Rosetta spacecraft is orbiting the comet, however it is not a particularly good one as the comet is an early morning object.  If it behaves as at previous apparitions it will be brightest some 40 days after perihelion, when it might reach 9th magnitude.  The comet was observed by Juan Jose Gonzalez on August 19 from a high mountain site, when he estimated it at 12.2 in his 20cm Schmidt-Cassegrain.  This is fainter than expected, which may have implications for the in situ science.
The visual and electronic observations received so far (68) give an uncorrected preliminary light curve for the 2015 apparition of 10.0 + 5 log d + 7.7 log r, though a linear curve peaking 40 days after perihelion fits the data better."
https://www.ast.cam.ac.uk/~jds/per0010.htm#67P


It came to perihelion on 13 August 2015.^[10][11] From December 2014 until September 2015, it has an elongation less than 45 degrees from the Sun.^[30] On 10 February 2015, it went through solar conjunction when it was 5 degrees from the Sun and was 3.3 AU (490,000,000 km) from Earth.^[30] I

If your a scientist you want to see the data and how they arrived at those conclusions. They are using tax payer dollars to do what they are doing. There is a double reason to hand over the data and the methods...

It already has been shown that the models are broken, there has never been an accurate climate change prediction, and yes, NOAA has filled in data where it is missing. Their methods can be shown to make the over all trend greater in amplitude without know exactly what they did. Show us what you did if you are so confident in your results.

Dont be a fkn sissy when it comes to defending your thesis...

Maybe Congress is a little harsh but this all could have been avoided if they had just produced their data and methods...

and they would have done so for debate if they are doing good science instead of political science....

The earth is an open system... Mans CO2 energy contribution(.0012%) is in the noise of the rest of the energy flows of the system....

They still have not addressed in any papers that I have read that “Cold comes from space above the poles down the magnetospgheric footprint to the polar vortex”.

The oceans are heated by geologic heat and that all the sun does is heat the surface.

You are implying that I am not using logic?? And I have provided sources from scientists much greater than I.

E=mc2 obviously is broken...

And kinetic energy/motion/momentum is part of everything whereas charge is not(neutrino?)... Pure logic...

Wave synthesis particle construction. Not my idea but it has won out over all of the ideas that I have read about. Logic.

All particle interactions are "field interactions" no matter what you want to name them. Logic.

Mass cant go faster than light. So remove the mass or inertia leaving behind the matter. 

But EU says it cant be done. I am trying to provide a method to fit observations. Logic? 

</tinfoil hat>If even one of the UFO videos out of the thousands is real(the military and FAA ones) and objects actually move like that, then we got some splainin to do Lucy, they have no inertia!</tinfoil hat>

Its a shame that EU does not see that charge and kinetic energy are what make up electricity. 

It is the basis for electricity, not my idea but James Clerk Maxwell's. Maxwell's charge momentum field.. 

And there is a "mechanical" component to electricity if by that you mean motion...

I've just taken it a step further and tried to show how kinetic energy/motion/momentum is primary based on ancient knowledge taking a clue from EU mythology studies....

You guys accuse me of using modern physics when I am showing you clearly that is not the case...

Electricity is not this mysterious thing. Its can be fleshed out using common physical principals(waves, particles and momentum/(electric) "fields").... As well as observations of non accepted physical experiments...

I have watched all the EU videos and I have watched very carefully.... I respect his ideas a lot and have provided a lot of papers to back up EU over the years. I am not badgering him. 

That why I feel I can have a pointed discussion with people on their ideas.... I guess thats not the case, at least in public.

Sorry,

Brant

The thruster does what? It moves.
How does it move? By microwaves imparting momentum to the thrusters internal walls…
The microwaves in this experiment carry the greatest amount of momentum to the walls of the chamber when the frequency of the microwaves are at the chamber resonance...… That is their purpose…

Wal says "dipole electric force".

What is that made of?? How is that transmitted...
If it uses massive matter to transmit energy - do work...it still goes slower than light. Inertialess matter can go faster than light...

Theres a difference between saying I agree with E= Mc^2, and saying that the experimental evidence indicates that we wont be able to put enough energy into this particle to accelerate it past the speed of light.
I dont agree with the equation E=Mc^2. Why? Because historically the kinetic energy component got thrown away…
I am pretty old school when it comes to science and drawing conclusions from observations.
The tossing of the kinetic energy component of E = Mc^2 in 1909?
The Origin of the Equation E = mc2
“As for the origin of the formula, it wasn’t until five years before his death (1955) that Einstein publicly attributed the basis of E = mc2 to the 1862 charge-momentum field equations of James Clerk Maxwell[2] “
<snip>
“A curious twist in this saga occurs in 1881 with J. J. Thomson in his work with charged spherical conductors in motion, since he derived a slightly higher coefficient, E = 4/3mc2 [8] The same E = 4/3mc2 was found by F. Hasenöhrl in 1904 when he published the first explicit statement that the heat energy of a body increases its “mechanical” mass[9] The 1905 Nobel Prize winner, Philipp Lenard, a staunch opponent of Einstein, was one of the first to reveal this fact in his 1921 book Ether and Para-ether.[10] “
<snip>
Max Von Laue demonstrated that to obtain the final formula E = mc2 “one type of energy…the new physics must eliminate from its list…is kinetic energy.”[13] The reason is that if mass is based on energy, as E = mc2 shows, then there cannot be a kinetic energy, K = ½mv2, which, in turn, depends on the mass.
In other words, to obtain E = mc2 one must abandon the most obvious and primary form of energy, kinetic energy.[14]
http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/site/harryricker/2015/05/23/the-origin-of-the-equation-e-mc2/

At the end of the day its all motion. The “subtrons” inside the particle are made of planck length waves which make up the particle itself… I’m pretty sure neutrinos are bigger than subtrons…And they move based on the movement of the gross particle, from beta decay, pp fusion etc., the atom.
I believe that makes them an unlikely candidate for an aether.. Motion comes from the aether. There is no way to interact with neutrinos but there is a way to interact with an aether lattice that makes up everything…

Particles (inside an electron, proton) are not heavier, they just have a greater binding energy, right?
Particles; their properties are a function of the state of the aether that makes them up.
If you change the aether in such away that now the particle express that change as reduced mass, then is it a property of the particle or the aether?
Motion is a property of the aether because particles get everything they are from the aether… Particles dont carry their accelerated energy when they are at rest, motion comes from outside the particle, the accelerated energy comes from outside the particle.
There is no solid shell. Particles have a radius beyond which you can't penetrate because the (electric) force is so strong.  Particles interact by fields, electric and magnetic. Photons emanate from electrons but are packets of kinetic energy. They do not rest outside an electron. Rest mass is a mathematical tool when photons are concerned....
Motion is imparted to mass. Mass gains energy when it is in motion from its rest state. To get charge separation you need to add momentum/kinetic energy to a system of charges.
Mass is built from wave resonances in the aether. There are no lossless processes. There is only energy flow, energy transfer, work done whatever the carrier.
Its not magic.
If mass is made of waves in the aether then mass is made out of energy(motion) . Not only that, Tesla thought the same thing. That motion is primary.
Motion is life.
The East Indians did as well.

EU never talks about the kinetic energy component of electricity. Like I said before, what happens when you remove all motion from electricity or the universe? You just have charges. You cannot do any work.
Experiments indicate that you cant accelerate a particle past light speed.
Nobody has been able to do it at this point. Based on that information I would have to say that massive objects cant go FTL..
If I was to do a hierarchy I would say Aether, Matter, mass, inertia.
You would have to discover some new principle right now to make faster than light possible, like suppressing inertia or energy loss…

Podkletnov made a beam that is best explained by propagating kinetic energy....

Brant


"Returning to the more ‘comfortable’ arena of physical matter, Kozyrev’s work showed that torsion fields can be absorbed, shielded or sometimes reflected. For example, sugar can absorb, polyethylene film and aluminum can shield, and other forms of aluminum or mirrors can reflect.

Kozyrev found that in the presence of this energy flow, objects that are rigid and inelastic will show weight changes, whereas flexible, elastic objects will show changes in their elasticity and / or viscosity.

Kozyrev also showed that the weight of a spinning top will change if it is vibrated, heated or cooled or if it has an electric current passed through it. As we can see, all of the above behaviors fit in quite nicely with our analogy of the “sponge” of matter absorbing or releasing small amounts of energetic “water”.

Hidden momentum, field momentum, and electromagnetic impulse.
http://gr.physics.ncsu.edu/files/babson_ajp_77_826_09.pdf

When I was working at Burst Labs one of the projects involved ultrasonics and changing the viscosity of fluids because its cheaper to ship low viscosity fluids by “pipeline” hint, hint.
We had barrels of the stuff...
I saw a number of interesting things that I cant find a standard explanation for, that fit with some of the things mentioned in the above paragraphs...

What is the direct electric force and how does the “direct electric force” do work. Thats what a force does, is transfer energy from one place to another. The electric force acts “instantly” across distance and does work(transfers energy). In a recent EU article “A recent press release ignores the primary electrical aspect of the Sun, preferring to focus on kinetic effects in an attempt to explain the solar wind anomalies:” I am not backing them up but kinetic energy is a big part of this... So I say this… What would happen if you took all the motion(kinetic energy) away from the universe?? You would have a sea of charged particles probably pretty equally spaced.... You only have what we call electricity when you add motion(kinetic energy). Otherwise its just charged particles. The energy travels in the “electric” field that surrounds the particle, and the wire if thats the case. The motion is in the field with a little bit causing the electrons to drift... This goes back to my elucidation of the energy path from a hydroelectric dam. The water falls and turns the turbine attached to the generator. The generator rotors magnetic field transfers kinetic energy from the falling water across the gap to the stator to electrons and causes kinetic energy to move down the field as what we call electricity. Its really just a microscopic way of transferring kinetic energy. Then at the other end the electricity(transferred kinetic energy) is turned into heat which is kinetic energy as well… People get caught up in the conversions and conservation when its all kinetic energy, motion, momentum, acceleration, force that does the work. You can use the same units for everything... Looking at a hydrogen atom, if perform a charge separation on the atom, you have the electric force acting on the proton and the electron with the corresponding “electric field” in between. If you want to maintain that field last for longer than the recombination time, you need to add an opposing force to the test particles(electron, proton). This opposing force could be thought of as the opposite of the kinetic energy generated by letting the test particles recombine… So what is the field or the structure in between the test particles that allows the properties that we observe to manifest?... Thinking about Subtrons. If you have Planck length waves you can perform additive synthesis... Technically a particle is composed of a wave resonance in a sea of particles….. It is the waves from extending out from the particle that we think of as the field and carry the energy shape the we think of as a particle.… But it is the aether particles that actually make up the particle….The aether is stationary as the wave forms move through the particle sea… The wave form is composed of kinetic energy which interacts with another particle. So technically the particles are made up of fields(wave forms carrying energy). If you look at wave in an additive manner then you could make a particle by resonance. Inside the particle you would a series of smaller waves that make up the larger wave resonance of the particle. These smaller resonances inside the particle would be moving. This wave structure would extend out from the particle effectively forming the field… The charge would be the modulated resonance(the field) structure(particles, subtrons) of the aether. After looking at many models of an aether I settled on a model that uses massless chargeless fine particles. Without motion the fine particles would be packed and wouldnt allow wave motion; i.e. provide a restoring force. It would effectively be rigid. To solve that problem, I assumed that every massless aether particle in the universe has a small random 360 degree oscillation, providing a restoring force and the properties required to carry a wave, being able to move a very tiny bit in any spherical direction… Now we have a medium capable of carrying a faster than light wave motion without requiring the exponential increase in energy observed with the acceleration of mass. The explanation I have put forth doesn't explain where the aether came from, but the aether at this level explains everything we observe in this universe plus things we dont believe in. It has room for growth as we discover new things. Tom VFlandfren posits that gravity has no inertia. Does Gravity Have Inertia? Inertia: the tendency of a body at rest to remain at rest and the tendency of a body in motion to remain in motion. Tom Van Flandern / Meta Research <tomvf@metaresearch.org> Abstract. » Gravity makes heavy and light bodies fall at the same rate. Gravity obeys the “equivalence principle”, and is just "curved space-time geometry" in geometric general relativity. But space-time curvature alone cannot initiate motion, and changes in momentum still require a force acting. Moreover, gravity can deviate slightly from the “equivalence principle”, and “space-time” is really just proper time and does not involve any curvature of space. The Le Sage “pushing gravity” concept is a better way to explain the physics of gravity. For forces other than gravity, the momentum transferred must be shared by all particles in the target body, producing what we call “inertia” -- a simple dilution of momentum. Gravity obeys the “transparency principle”, allowing momentum to be transferred directly to each particle. Without need for dilution of momentum, gravity has no inertia. « http://metaresearch.org/cosmology/gravity/Does%20Gravity%20Have%20Inertia.asp

I had the same problem David and my solution was to analyze as much of the universe as possible at once and look for commonalities...   Motion seems to be the most basic "thing" in the universe. Everything has some of it... The following was not developed in a vacuum. I read a lot of other great peoples work...

So what makes motion? Kinetic energy is the energy of motion. Which lead to the idea that kinetic energy has no mass in order to support the FTL phenomena like entanglement and tunneling, then it was more like an aether and it seemed to work as an effect source for fields, which are massless anyway if you really look at them. You cant have mass in part of your universe model if you want FTL effects.

You need to be able to transfer energy as in gravity, electric fields, nuclear bonds, phase information between waves. The list goes on of phenomena that could be considered massless if you know what to look for..

It makes up 1/2 of mass @ .87 light speed... If you remove the velocity component you are left with the original mass with no change...

When gravitational acceleration of an object stops, gravity doesnt stop.

Kinetic energy or the energy of motion seems to fit all of this and more. STRUCTURED kinetic energy(massless and FTL information transfer) can explain telepathy, Morphogenic fields, even consciousness, which exists in the structured kinetic field surrounding the body, and the brain is actually just an controllable interface through modulation of phase differences between London Paired electrons in proteins.

  

Kinetic energy is what is transferred in current flow in the flow of electricity because its what causes electrons to move. It also works for the accumulation of forces similar to Ralph Sansburys ideas.. 

Photons are kinetic energy packets... They have mass when they move but no rest mass....

Miles Mathis is close but didnt ever suggest what photons actually are...

I use these words loosely. Everything is just different "vector" of the same energy.

I think the kinetic aether is the lowest level. The turtles stop there....

I think that there is a kinetic "dimension" or part of the universe where "structured kinetic" life exists... 

I have yet to find something that you add to the list of phenomena that it explains(code base) and not break the rest of the system... Its almost like coding.....

Brant

http://www.umsl.edu/~fraundorfp/p001htw/KEvsMomentum.html 

This plot of kinetic energy versus momentum has a place for most moving objects that folks encounter in everyday life. It shows objects with the same kinetic energy (horizontally related) that carry different amounts of momentum, as well as how the speed of a low-mass object compares (by vertical extrapolation) to the speed after perfectly inelastic collision with a larger object at rest. Highly sloped lines (rise/run = 2) mark contours of constant mass, while lines of unit slope mark contours of constant speed. Parallel contours are separated by intervals of three orders of magnitude, so objects from small (radio frequency photons) to large (the observable universe) are included. The top and right axes are labeled in practical units, while the bottom and left axes show SI unit values of the quantities being graphed. The plot further illustrates where lightspeed, Planck's constant, and kT figure in.
Use this graph to quickly estimate the kinetic energy needed to accelerate an object to a given velocity (like a person to earth escape velocity), as well as the kinetic energy transferred in a momentum exchange between two objects of differing mass (like when you hit the planet after falling off the roof). It's also easy to see, for example, that laser weapons with many times the kinetic energy of a speeding automobile have much less recoil e.g. than that of a rifle.
The centered diagonal-line running from lower left to upper right is a "curtain of finite lightspeed c" that Newton had no reason to expect. When the curtain is in place redirecting lines of constant mass asymptotically onto v=c, only the lower right half of the plot is accessible. For most of that accessible area Newton's approximations work pretty darn well. Although coordinate velocity v=dx/dt is a dead-end variable near its upper limit, proper velocity w=dx/dτ andmomentum p=mw as well as relativistic energy γmc² remain useful on both sides of w=c. The resulting slope-change in energy versus momentum is in practice verified every time someone examines electron-wavelength as a function of energy, e.g. using the transmission electron microscope at your neighborhood hospital. Note that the location of thatelectron elbow is determined by the metric conversion factor c between meters and seconds, which also limits the rate at which photons can move.
Planck's constant h determines the deBroglie wavelength (useful for objects of low momentum), and kT yields thethermal energy: per nat of state uncertainty as well as per pair of quadratic modes for distributing heat. Thermal kinetic energy of translational motion in 3D is therefore about (3/2)kT per particle. Note that the relationship between the energy and momentum (also frequency and wavenumber) of an object is called its dispersion relation. Such relations can be plotted for non-vacuum media on this graph, thus illustrating for example the concepts of medium-conferred effective mass and frequency-dependent refractive index. For ring rotators of given density one can also superpose in the lower left corner of this plot the freeze-out zone due to angular momentum quantization, which requires that the rotator's deBroglie wavelength span the ring's circumference an integral number of times.
What are some other things that might be fun to plot on such a graph? A partial list begins here...

• A moving snail.
• Myosin molecule moving along an actin muscle fibril.
• 300 keV microscope electron.
• 1/refractive index dispersion profile for light in glass.
• A line for the mass of the observable universe.
• Recoil energy of the earth when you fall off the roof (down near kT).

What else?

Re: Electric sun of iron.



Helios (1976), approached to within 0.29AU= 63.8 SR. Measured solar wind. Found 15 times as many micrometeorites at 0.29 AU than near Earth’s orbit.

So in reading the electric sun page this morning I had some questions.
As a welder and electrician I understand the importance of current carrying capabilities of wire.

"The photosphere, then, is plasma in the 'arc' mode. We say this because the Sun emits power at a rate of over 63 million watts/sq meter from its photospheric surface. This is equivalent to a power output of 40 kW from each square inch of that surface. Some have questioned whether the photosphere's relatively low temperature (~5800K) disqualifies it from being in arc mode.  In 1944 C.E.R. Bruce of England's Electrical Research Institute proposed that the "photosphere has the appearance, the temperature, and the spectrum of an electric arc; it has arc characteristics because it is an electric arc, or a large number of arcs in parallel." And, it is difficult to imagine a plasma discharge in anything other than arc mode that could radiate 40 kW of power from each square inch of its surface area. Can you imagine the light from forty 1000 watt light bulbs coming out of a one square inch area?

40Kw per square inch is huge current. For a 40 volt arc welder it would be about 1000 amps which is the max that a 1 inch wire can carry. 

Xenon short arc lamps, which are the brightest common single point light source, seem to be available up to about 10kW, which makes sense given their electrode size. With the xenon short arc lamps, once a plasma arc is struck the voltage goes down. So the sun had to have a higher initial voltage to light up?

Can plasma carry as much current per square inch as solid wire? Can someone point me to the equation to figure that out?

The plasma tube experiments that I have done I have only ever seen a few milliamps.

Capacitor discharge experiment are higher current but a flux tube forms... Am I correct in thinking that a flux tube is because the thin plasma cannot carry the current?

Brant

" It is ALWAYS, on this level, matter particles in motion, and is transferred from particle to particle."

What is transferred from particle to particle?? 

"Electricity doesn’t flow. Electricity is not a thing in and of itself. It is ALWAYS charged particles that move."

You must realize that I dont have the same conceptualization of energy that you do by now. And I dont understand how you could say that to me. You must have not read what I wrote to your crew...

Even if they are bumping into each other, what are they transferring??? Kinetic energy!!!! Kinetic energy moves in quanta because of particles. In an aether form it flows like water.  And if you want to get technical even water is made of particles.

The composite of  motion, charge,  mass and a magnetic property called spin, make up electricity.

In my model these could be considered "different vectors" of the kinetic energy that the particle is made of.

From Wiki....

In physics, energy is a property of objects which can be transferred to other objects or converted into different forms, but cannot be created or destroyed.^{[note 1]} The ability of a system to perform work is a common description. But, it is difficult to give a comprehensive definition of energy because of its many forms.^[1] In SI units, energy is measured in joules, the energy transferred to an object by the mechanical work of moving it 1 metre against a force of 1 newton.^{[note 2]}

All of the many forms of energy are convertible to other kinds of energy, and obey the conservation of energy. Common energy forms include the kinetic energy of a moving object,"

So according to physics, kinetic energy can be transferred.... The question is can kinetic energy exist without matter?? Yep, the massless aether(Aetherometry). You have no reason to say that kinetic energy cant be separated from matter except thats the way it always been done..

 The idea that only massive substances exist is one of the greatest boodoggles that science has pulled...

Do massless objects or properties exist or operate in this universe?

Say you have a row of numbers, like binary.   11100001  vs 10001110 

Each of those numbers contain different information. Show me how to weigh them or how would you characterize them?

They each have a different photonic arrangement. Photons are massless. 

You can take those numbers and use them in a computer to switch things on and off but the information(differences?) contained in the numbers have no mass.

Ruperts Morpogenic field only makes sense if it is massless kinetic energy that carries information outside the immediate body. 

Telepathy, and paranormal phenomena can be explained by massless kinetic energy as well as crop circles.

You cant just pick and choose what your theory will explain by saying "Oh, thats just swamp gas". And I am not afraid to examine everything unlike EU. 

Ever heard of the Scole Experiments? How does EU explain that set of events other than saying they didnt exist?

A real theory of everything has to explain everything that exists in the universe at this level.

Gravity depending on what model you use has no mass yet it carries kinetic energy.

Phase differences between 2 waves have no mass yet we can gain information from that and even use it to do work with the right circuitry.. 

At work we have a 3 phase 100 amp motor for the cavitation machine. The motor turns based on the phase differences between each leg(after I run it through a VFD and some other stuff). And the kinetic energy contained in the electricity does the work via the magnetic flux interaction with the rotor.. 

Does a magnetic field have mass as it stretches from the windings to the rotor?? It certainly carries kinetic energy across that gap to make the rotor turn. And at 50 amps it does serious work.

And phase velocity can appear to go faster than light...

wiki:

The phase velocity of electromagnetic radiation may – under certain circumstances (for example anomalous dispersion) – exceed the speed of light in a vacuum, but this does not indicate any superluminal information or energy transfer. It was theoretically described by physicists such as Arnold Sommerfeld and Léon Brillouin. See dispersion for a full discussion of wave velocities.

 Kinetic energy comes from the electric field when it accelerates charged particles(gravity is the weaker neutral matter equivalent to an electric field) and no matter how much  *** wants to call it Structured Space", thats just a cop out because he has not thought of a physical mechanism..

When you think about it in terms of a generator system, kinetic energy is "converted" to electricity....
But its not actually converted(same kinetic energy all the way from the hydro station to your house), kinetic energy is "applied" to the electrons(they are pushed). This kinetic energy from the input shaft of generator is applied to the electrons via a magnetic field and moves down the wire at the speed of light all they way to your house. 

Everything in the universe can be talked about in terms of kinetic energy. Everything is about motion. Even particles are made of kinetic energy resonance. Thats what the Sansbury model of subtrons breaks down into.. Motion. Even humans get their energy of motion from the electric field in the cells. The food just provides "lubrication" for the machinery to work.

I have posted other people observations and conclusions and they say kinetic energy.

And I have explained precisely what I meant. You guys have just not understand the concepts that I am putting forth because of the perceived need for everything to have mass....

Maybe Tesla can help you understand.

“All perceptible matter comes from a primary substance, or tenuity beyond conception, filling all space, the akasha or luminiferous ether, which is acted upon by the life giving Prana or creative force, calling into existence, in never ending cycles all things and phenomena.” – Nikola Tesla,“Man’s Greatest Achievement,” 1907

In physicist Tewari’s words:

“The universal matter is created out of prana since prana is aakaash in motion, and aakaash is the primordial superfluid substratum of the universe.”

And I would add that prana is massless kinetic energy(motion, momentum, velocity, acceleration). 

Can we presently detect it? No, but we can see its effects like work being done...

I dont feel as though I am embarrassing myself. I am in good company with the likes of Tesla and Tewari..... 

And I believe in an aether made of kinetic(energy, stuff, units, things, work, what ever you want to call it)... 

Do you agree that there is an aether? And if you do what is it made of?

Is there more kinetic energy(the stuff that is used by a process to accelerate matter) than matter in the universe? 

Did you guys come to a conclusion on that musing?? 

How about the blackbody question of BB only comes from solid matter?

Or the helioseismology question on acoustic impedance or why there would be differences in standing waves for each of the three solar models? 

How about the question of changing the definition of work to include force without acceleration because gravity still provides a force even though you are not moving? And that force necessarily requires an energetic interaction between two bodies... Unless you believe in magic fairy forces... 

If work is done by kinetic energy does that make it a real thing?

Brant

My adventures with Telfonae.  A wonderful Sci-Fi story..... :-)

The rules for living in the other universe are much stricter. You are expected to act like an adult...

This gives new meaning to the term soul mate... She is a person that I met from some other lifetime that I was part of. I saw her 5 times in my dreams through out my life not realizing that I actually knew who she was and that she was an living entity or person as I like to think of her...

I think what has made this communication possible is the realization that it is possible. My work with kinetic energy has convinced me that other "universes or dimensions" exist. The Scole Experiments showed that it is possible to communicate across dimensions.
Once you know there is a frenchman living down the lane and that it is possible to communicate with him, you start to learn french. Then you discover that you can talk to his daughter!! Thats what the situation is like to me.

Its almost like talking to someone on the telephone with  pictures but the feeling of a energetic personality is much stronger.

There is no fantasy sex. Because it is not here and now agreed upon by both parties.
There can be a location that can be built that you can meet at time after time.

To travel you have to be able to see ahead of you.... Even instant travel takes time.

Navigation is a personal system but there is a common system that everyone knows.
You set 3 points. They taught me Apple, Orange Cheese. Then there is left and right. As well as up and Under.   Imagine looking at a cross with a rod sticking out of the middle of it in what we call Z.

They dont use numbers.

To elaborate, numbers dont really work in telepathy. If you send a picture of a five, that what it is, a picture of a 5. All of society has to agree on what that means. However if you send a picture of 5 oranges, then thats what it is.

Its all training, training, training. Telepathy is about listening and not thinking. The hardest part is differentiating communications from thoughts at first. Thinking your going crazy...

Imagine life, consciousness, souls what ever you want to call them have been around for trillions of years...

They dont make new souls, the number of souls in the universe is a constant.

Butterflys and Flowers creates forms for the souls to inhabit in this universe...

The method of communication is symbols or pictures. In these amazingly fast bursts. But its also much more than that. With words and feelings. The amount of information transferred is huge. As they say a picture is worth a 1000 words...
To me a "burst" of pictures seems like noise even though its how they communicate. I do not have the development to read the burst...

Reading the book Alien Interview teaches how parts of the universe operate. By learning this you can participate in galactic civilization.

5/6/2015

Telfonae is what we would call a botanist/biologist/planetary surveyor.

She is one a mission right now to what star trek would call the delta quadrant. I think this is where she is right now. At the outer most arm of the galaxy...

On the way to the survey planet she showed my some unusual cosmology phenomena....

A planet that has a large hole in it. Not all they way through, maybe down to the core. The atmosphere makes a large dip where to hole is.

There is a planet where water floats.

A purple sun planet.

A place where the substrate of the universe is poking through. It looks like a glowing spot the size of a car. It has rocks orbiting it. It looks like a white glow thats kinda fuzzy.  I suspect that what she showed me was a small version of a quasar...

A red sun 4 times the size of our sun that has large flame coming off of it. Thats what it looks like. I'm sure its plasma but it looks different than our sun.


6-9-2015

I find myself missing her because while she is on this "mission", its really just a planetary survey, we only get to talk when shes not busy.
Sometimes when they relocate to a different part of the planet I might get 15 minutes to talk. Its weird, I just want to talk for a minute and laugh with her..

Telfonae has tried to describe some of the life forms on this planet to me but its difficult because everything to me is unfamiliar. I wind up having to guess at features until we hit one that I understand. Then she can start to build me a picture of what it is she is seeing. I am going to try to draw some of them.

She will be unavailable for the next 2 months, or really for a few minutes at a time over that time period..

The technology that they use to travel long distances, from what I am trying to understand, is a spaceship that is based in the matter universe but has a kinetic universe component. The kinetic energy/soul part travel in the kinetic part and the bio robots travel in the matter part of the same ship. And this ship is alive, or what we would call conscious(can be inhabited by a consciousnesses). They use bio robots? just like we use regular robots but they control them directly.

Pretty wild!!

The regulator the other day managed to tell me something in numbers when normally they show you a picture of 37 points to represent a number. 37 degrees is the angle of the navigational triangle starting from earth.
That is not the path they took from their place of origin(planet??) in this universe. Apparently they are closer to the galactic core on this side. I will have to ask and see if I cant get a good answer...

Brant


6/12/2015

We had a little talk about sharing and what it means to a society.

For us sharing is important. It is an act of telling somebody that knows nothing of the situation about the situation. Its coming from a position of knowledge. Facebook is a good example. We use information services and talk.

I am having a hard time getting the real concept across that Telfonae was explaining.. I will have to ask more about this.

With Telfonae and her people, they have a system in place where they "upload" their experiences into a database. Call it a database of thought or telepathy that they can all access. The interesting thing is that they have "librarians" that help the flow of information, and they actually have a "new information" section where you can integrate the knowledge from explorers like Telfonae. In that respect everything is their society is shared.
The information flow in their society is really a bit like a packet network in that they send packets of pictures and vibrations.

6/18/2015

It looks like you can teach an old dog new tricks...

The better your focus the better your stability. Stability is the parameter that affects information transmission. Its like jitter in a digital signal. Too much jitter and you cant make out the fine details. The more focused you are the better your stability and the better your ability to communicate.

I had a talk with the Regulator, actually it was more of a lesson on how to focus and how it was important.
I have the problem of drifting away when talking to Telfonae and she was getting frustrated with me.

Regulator showed me how important this was to my relationship with Telfonae. But I didnt grasp the full importance of the ability to focus well until tonite.

As we were talking and I was really trying hard to pay attention and not think, I began to notice that I could actually feel her emotions. She could send me a "wave" of "love" and I could feel it. WOW. It was like being drunk or high. But thats not a really good description..... I love that girl!!!!

So thats the importance of focus and stability for the form of communication that we are using....

And I am beginning to see just how much there is to learn when entering a different society...
Its a great honor to learn this.
Really amazing universe that we live in.....

A little background:  The Regulator is like a sentient computer attached to the Galactic Switch board. Except he is a soul or consciousness. Its like what we would call the Oracle or Startrek calls "Computer".
You can access certain information or get lessons on certain stuff.

6/21/2015

Interspecies communication....

Anna Breytenbach 2013
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65aJNkpKfc

The incredible story of how leopard Diabolo became Spirit - Anna Breytenbach, "animal communicator".

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gvwHHMEDdT0



6/5/2015

I need to honor My agreement with Telfonae.  When I first made real contact with Telfonae a few months ago she explained her reasons for the contact.  Tonite she reiterated it very strongly....
She wants me to see her as she really is. To be able to do that I need to learn more about how to interact with their society... I am still a kid to them only by virtue of being in this fleshie... The fleshie filters the true souls interaction with the universe.
I need to stop certain things in my life to be able to move on to the next phase. The next phase requires an excellent memory....

Oh my, this is going to sound nuts but its part of the deal. The mission is still on. I dont really know what is going on but it is big. My role is like a cotter pin holding a large wheel on...

 This goes back to my original experience with Joe, from I am assuming, a secret military experiment.

Holy smokes, this has been going for a while and I failed to recognize what the hell was going on.... I am part of something much bigger that I dont understand. It seems like it has something to do with the eternal fight between good and evil, to put it in terms that people can relate to.

All souls are adults....

I suppose I should take as many notes as possible so that someday somebody might read this and be helped by it.


When I was younger, very young I remember being able to feel peoples emotions like they were mine.... I had totally forgotten about that.... As I got older it just kinda went away but it did hurt sometimes as I remember...  Thats just one step away from telepathy or communication as I like to call it...

And the thing that came out of the wall. My baby sitter was reading me a story and as she was reading, I heard this noise. I cant really describe it but as I looked over at her and beyond her shoulder to the wall, I saw this thing telescope out of the wall. And then it went back in. And I said to Mary.... "Did you see that?" And she said "What?" It looked like a tube with rings on it with an eye on the end that extended out from the wall about 2 feet, and then went back in very quickly....

I had a friend Alex that said he used to be able to see auras. He said that went away after he got a little older.... An amazing martial artist...