You are implying that I am not using logic?? And I have provided sources from scientists much greater than I.
E=mc2 obviously is broken...
And kinetic energy/motion/momentum is part of everything whereas charge is not(neutrino?)... Pure logic...
Wave synthesis particle construction. Not my idea but it has won out over all of the ideas that I have read about. Logic.
All particle interactions are "field interactions" no matter what you want to name them. Logic.
Mass cant go faster than light. So remove the mass or inertia leaving behind the matter.
But EU says it cant be done. I am trying to provide a method to fit observations. Logic?
</tinfoil hat>If even one of the UFO videos out of the thousands is real(the military and FAA ones) and objects actually move like that, then we got some splainin to do Lucy, they have no inertia!</tinfoil hat>
Its a shame that EU does not see that charge and kinetic energy are what make up electricity.
It is the basis for electricity, not my idea but James Clerk Maxwell's. Maxwell's charge momentum field..
And there is a "mechanical" component to electricity if by that you mean motion...
I've just taken it a step further and tried to show how kinetic energy/motion/momentum is primary based on ancient knowledge taking a clue from EU mythology studies....
You guys accuse me of using modern physics when I am showing you clearly that is not the case...
Electricity is not this mysterious thing. Its can be fleshed out using common physical principals(waves, particles and momentum/(electric) "fields").... As well as observations of non accepted physical experiments...
I have watched all the EU videos and I have watched very carefully.... I respect his ideas a lot and have provided a lot of papers to back up EU over the years. I am not badgering him.
That why I feel I can have a pointed discussion with people on their ideas.... I guess thats not the case, at least in public.
Sorry,
Brant
No comments:
Post a Comment