" It is ALWAYS, on this level, matter particles in motion, and is transferred from particle to particle."
What is transferred from particle to particle??
"Electricity doesn’t flow. Electricity is not a thing in and of itself. It is ALWAYS charged particles that move."
You must realize that I dont have the same conceptualization of energy that you do by now. And I dont understand how you could say that to me. You must have not read what I wrote to your crew...
Even if they are bumping into each other, what are they transferring??? Kinetic energy!!!! Kinetic energy moves in quanta because of particles. In an aether form it flows like water. And if you want to get technical even water is made of particles.
The composite of motion, charge, mass and a magnetic property called spin, make up electricity.
In my model these could be considered "different vectors" of the kinetic energy that the particle is made of.
From Wiki....
In physics, energy is a property of objects which can be transferred to other objects or converted into different forms, but cannot be created or destroyed.[note 1] The ability of a system to perform work is a common description. But, it is difficult to give a comprehensive definition of energy because of its many forms.[1] In SI units, energy is measured in joules, the energy transferred to an object by the mechanical work of moving it 1 metre against a force of 1 newton.[note 2]
All of the many forms of energy are convertible to other kinds of energy, and obey the conservation of energy. Common energy forms include the kinetic energy of a moving object,"
So according to physics, kinetic energy can be transferred.... The question is can kinetic energy exist without matter?? Yep, the massless aether(Aetherometry). You have no reason to say that kinetic energy cant be separated from matter except thats the way it always been done..
The idea that only massive substances exist is one of the greatest boodoggles that science has pulled...
Do massless objects or properties exist or operate in this universe?
Say you have a row of numbers, like binary. 11100001 vs 10001110
Each of those numbers contain different information. Show me how to weigh them or how would you characterize them?
They each have a different photonic arrangement. Photons are massless.
You can take those numbers and use them in a computer to switch things on and off but the information(differences?) contained in the numbers have no mass.
Ruperts Morpogenic field only makes sense if it is massless kinetic energy that carries information outside the immediate body.
Telepathy, and paranormal phenomena can be explained by massless kinetic energy as well as crop circles.
You cant just pick and choose what your theory will explain by saying "Oh, thats just swamp gas". And I am not afraid to examine everything unlike EU.
Ever heard of the Scole Experiments? How does EU explain that set of events other than saying they didnt exist?
A real theory of everything has to explain everything that exists in the universe at this level.
Gravity depending on what model you use has no mass yet it carries kinetic energy.
Phase differences between 2 waves have no mass yet we can gain information from that and even use it to do work with the right circuitry..
At work we have a 3 phase 100 amp motor for the cavitation machine. The motor turns based on the phase differences between each leg(after I run it through a VFD and some other stuff). And the kinetic energy contained in the electricity does the work via the magnetic flux interaction with the rotor..
Does a magnetic field have mass as it stretches from the windings to the rotor?? It certainly carries kinetic energy across that gap to make the rotor turn. And at 50 amps it does serious work.
And phase velocity can appear to go faster than light...
wiki:
The phase velocity of electromagnetic radiation may – under certain circumstances (for example anomalous dispersion) – exceed the speed of light in a vacuum, but this does not indicate any superluminal information or energy transfer. It was theoretically described by physicists such as Arnold Sommerfeld and Léon Brillouin. See dispersion for a full discussion of wave velocities.
Kinetic energy comes from the electric field when it accelerates charged particles(gravity is the weaker neutral matter equivalent to an electric field) and no matter how much *** wants to call it Structured Space", thats just a cop out because he has not thought of a physical mechanism..
When you think about it in terms of a generator system, kinetic energy is "converted" to electricity....
But its not actually converted(same kinetic energy all the way from the hydro station to your house), kinetic energy is "applied" to the electrons(they are pushed). This kinetic energy from the input shaft of generator is applied to the electrons via a magnetic field and moves down the wire at the speed of light all they way to your house.
But its not actually converted(same kinetic energy all the way from the hydro station to your house), kinetic energy is "applied" to the electrons(they are pushed). This kinetic energy from the input shaft of generator is applied to the electrons via a magnetic field and moves down the wire at the speed of light all they way to your house.
Everything in the universe can be talked about in terms of kinetic energy. Everything is about motion. Even particles are made of kinetic energy resonance. Thats what the Sansbury model of subtrons breaks down into.. Motion. Even humans get their energy of motion from the electric field in the cells. The food just provides "lubrication" for the machinery to work.
I have posted other people observations and conclusions and they say kinetic energy.
And I have explained precisely what I meant. You guys have just not understand the concepts that I am putting forth because of the perceived need for everything to have mass....
Maybe Tesla can help you understand.
“All perceptible matter comes from a primary substance, or tenuity beyond conception, filling all space, the akasha or luminiferous ether, which is acted upon by the life giving Prana or creative force, calling into existence, in never ending cycles all things and phenomena.” – Nikola Tesla,“Man’s Greatest Achievement,” 1907
In physicist Tewari’s words:
“The universal matter is created out of prana since prana is aakaash in motion, and aakaash is the primordial superfluid substratum of the universe.”
And I would add that prana is massless kinetic energy(motion, momentum, velocity, acceleration).
Can we presently detect it? No, but we can see its effects like work being done...
I dont feel as though I am embarrassing myself. I am in good company with the likes of Tesla and Tewari.....
And I believe in an aether made of kinetic(energy, stuff, units, things, work, what ever you want to call it)...
Do you agree that there is an aether? And if you do what is it made of?
Is there more kinetic energy(the stuff that is used by a process to accelerate matter) than matter in the universe?
Did you guys come to a conclusion on that musing??
How about the blackbody question of BB only comes from solid matter?
Or the helioseismology question on acoustic impedance or why there would be differences in standing waves for each of the three solar models?
How about the question of changing the definition of work to include force without acceleration because gravity still provides a force even though you are not moving? And that force necessarily requires an energetic interaction between two bodies... Unless you believe in magic fairy forces...
If work is done by kinetic energy does that make it a real thing?
Brant
No comments:
Post a Comment